Foucault and deaf education in Finland

  • Lauri Siisiäinen
Keywords: deaf education, deafness, oralist pedagogy, oralism, normalization, disciplinary power, Finland

Abstract

The influence of Michel Foucault’s thinking in critical disability studies, and to social studies of deafness, can hardly be doubted. Foucault has offered valuable tools for the critical rethinking of deaf education and pedagogy with respect to normalization and disciplinary power, which are integrally related to the historical construction of deafness as deficiency and pathology by modern, medical, and psychological knowledge. This article explores the applicability and critical potential of the Foucauldian concepts of disciplinary power, surveillance, and normalization within the specific context of the history of deaf education in Finland. The article focuses on the modernization of the education of deaf children that began during the latter half of the nineteenth century in Finland, with the influence of oralism – a pedagogical discourse and deaf-education methods of German origin. Deafness was characterized as a pathology or abnormality of the most severe kind. When taken at the general level, Foucault’s well-known concepts are easily applicable to the analysis of deaf education, also in the Finnish context. However, it is argued that things become much more complex if we first examine more closely the roles played by the eye and the ear, by optic and aural experience, in these Foucauldian notions, and if we then relate this enquiry to our analysis of oralist pedagogy and deaf education.

References

Allan, J., Brown, S. & Riddell, S (1998). Permission to speak? theorising special education inside the classroom. In C. Clark et al. (Eds.) Theorising special education (pp. 21-32). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

Allan, J. (2007). Rethinking inclusive education: the philosophers of difference in practice. Dordrecht: Springer.

Amman, J.C. (1873). A dissertation on speech. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Low, and Searle.

Amman, J.C. (1694). The talking deaf man. London: Tho. Hawkins.

Arnold, P. (1984). The education of the deaf child: for integration or autonomy? American annals of the deaf, 129(1), 29-37.

Barthes, R. (1982). L’obvie et l’obtus: essais critiques III. Manchecourt: Éditions du Seuil.

Bauman H.-D. (2004). Audism: understanding the metaphysics of oppression. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 9(2), 239-246.

Bauman, H.-D. (2008). Listening to phonocentrism with deaf eyes: Derrida’s mute philosophy of (sign) language. Essays in philosophy, 9(1), article 2.

Bentham, J. (1995). The Panopticon writings. London: Verso.

Branson, J. & Miller, D. (2002). Damned for their difference: the cultural construction of deaf people as disabled. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.

Debord, G. (1999). The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books.

Derrida, J. (1967). Of grammatology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. (1997). ‘Il faut défendre la société’. Cours au Collège de France [‘The society must be defended’. Course at the Collège de France]. 1976. Paris: Gallimard/Seuil.

Foucault, M. (2001). L’oeil du pouvoir [The eye of power]. In D. Defert & F. Ewald (Eds.) Michel Foucault: Dits et écrits II. 1976-1988 (pp.190-207). Paris: Gallimard.

Foucault, M. (2003). Le pouvoir psychiatrique. Cours au Collège de France [Psychiatric power. Course at Collège de France]. 1973-1974. Paris: Gallimard/Seuil.

Foucault, M. (2004). Securité, territoire, population. Cours au Collège de France [Security, Territory, Population. Course at Collège de France]. 1977-1978. Paris: Gallimard/Seuil.

Juurmaa, J. (1963). On the ability structure of the deaf. Jyväskylä: OY Keskisuomalainen kirjapaino.

Juurmaa, J. (1967). The ability structure of the blind and the deaf: final report. In Clark, L.L. (Ed.) Research Bulletin No (pp. 109-123). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.

Knowlson, J.R. (1965). The idea of gesture as a universal language in the 17th and 18th Centuries. Journal of the history of ideas, 26(4), 495-508.

Lane, H.L. (1984). When the mind hears: a history of the deaf. New York: Random House.

Lane, H.L. (2002). Do deaf people have a disability? Sign language studies, 2(4), 356-379.

Markowicz, H. (1972). Some sociolinguistic considerations of American sign language. Sign language studies, 1, 15-41.

Salmi, E. & Laakso, M. (2005). Maahan lämpimään: Suomen viittomakielisten historia [Into the warm ground: the history of Finnish people using sign language]. Helsinki: Kuurojen liitto ry [Finnish Society of the Deaf].

Seigel, J.P. (1969). The enlightenment and the evolution of a language of signs in France and England. Journal of the history of ideas, 30(1), 96-115.

Tremain, S. (Ed.). (2005). Foucault and the government of disability. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Published
2016-03-29
How to Cite
Siisiäinen, L. (2016). Foucault and deaf education in Finland. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 7. https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.2095