Care work an diffusion of innovation in Danish elder care

  • Luise Li Langergaard Roskilde University
Keywords: Public sector innovation, elder care, knowledge sharing, care work, Denmark

Abstract

This article explores the interplay between different types of knowledge and rationality in care work through a case study of a nursing home innovation project in a Danish municipality. The aim is to understand the implications for innovation processes and dissemination within the context of elder care. Care work, in some sense, relies on relational and contextual knowledge which may lead to challenges when innovation and best practices are to be diffused across organizations. This is especially true since diffusion often relies on codification of practices and knowledge. Caring rationality is essential to how technologies and methods are practiced in the care situation, and thus also essential for best practices and how they are disseminated. However, other types of codified and explicit rationality are equally important. The article concludes that there are several types of knowledge in play in care work practices and innovation, and it indicates that communities of practice could be key to understanding how to share and learn from best practices across organizations. 

Author Biography

Luise Li Langergaard, Roskilde University
Department of People and Technology

References

Bacchi, L. C., & Beasley, C. (2002). Citizen bodies: Is embodied citizenship a contradiction in terms? Critical Social Policy, 22(2), 324–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183020220020801

Bason, C. (2007). Velfærdsinnovation: ledelse af nytænkning i den offentlige sektor. København: Børsen.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science: Special Issue: Organizational Learning: Papers in Honor of (and By) James G. March, 2(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40

Dahl, H. M. (2009). New public management, care and struggles about recognition. Critical Social Policy, 29(4), 634–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018309341903

Dahl, H. M. (2012). “Omsorg, Styring og Køn Gennem Tavshed og Italesættelse.” Kvinder, Køn & Forskning no. 3, 52–59.

Dahl, H. M., & Rasmussen, B. (2012). Paradoxes in elderly care: The Nordic model. In A. Kamp & H. Hvid (Eds.), Elderly care in transition: Management, meaning and identity at work. A Scandinavian perspective (pp. 29–49). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

Daly, M., & Lewis, J. (2000). The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 281–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00281.x

Davies, C. (1995). Competence versus care? Gender and caring work revisited. Acta Sociologica, 38(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939503800103

De Jong, J. P. J. & Vermeulen, P. A. M. (2003). Organizing successful new service development: A literature review. Management Decision, 41(9), 844–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310491706

Du Gay, P. (2008). 'Without affection or enthusiasm' problems of involvement and attachment in 'responsive' public management. Organization, 15(3), 335–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508408088533

Dybbroe, B. (2012). The meaning of work from subjective and intersubjective perspectives – a daily conflict of creating and losing meaning in elderly care. In A. Kamp & H. Hvid (Eds.), Elderly care in transition: Management, meaning and identity at work. A Scandinavian perspective (pp. 131–64). Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School Press.

Eriksen, E. O. (1999). Kommunikativ ledelse: Om styring af offentlige organisationer. Fakbokforlaget: Bergen.

Fine, M., & Glendinning, C. (2005). Dependence, independence or inter-dependence? Revisiting the concepts of 'care' and 'dependency'. Ageing & Society, 25, 601–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X05003600

Friedman, M. (1995). Beyond caring: The de-moralization of gender. In V. Held (Ed.), Justice and care: essential readings in feminist ethics (pp. 61–77). Colorado US and Oxford UK: Westview Press.

Fuglsang, L. (2008). "Balancen mellem ledelse og bricolage: ledelsesdilemmaer i bæredygtig offentlig innovation." Paper til Det Danske ledelsesakademis 3. konference, Clarion Hotel, København, d. 8.-9. december.

Fuglsang, L., & Rønning, R. (2014). Introduction – framing innovation in public service sectors: A contextual approach. In L. Fuglsang, R. Rønning & B. Enquist (Eds.), Framing innovation in public service sectors (pp. 1–17). New York and London: Routledge.

Fuglsang, L., & Sørensen, F. (2011).The balance between bricolage and innovation: Management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 31(4), 581–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2010.504302

Gilligan, C. (2009). In a different voice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Habermas, J. (1990). "Moral, samfund og etik: Et interview ved Torben Hviid Nielsen. Politica Bind 22, Det civile samfund, 224–247.

Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34.

Hartley, J. (2016). Organisational and governance aspects of diffusing public innovation. In J. Torfing P. Triantafilou (Eds.) Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance (pp. 71–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hartley, J., & Benington, J. (2006). Copy and paste, or graft and transplant? Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational networks. Public Money & Management, 26(2), 101–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00508.x

Held, V. (1995). Introduction. In V. Held (Ed.), Justice and care: Essential readings in feminist ethics (pp. 61–77). Colorado US and Oxford UK: Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6386(95)90075-6

Kamp, A., & Hvid, H. (2012). Introduction: Elderly care in transition. In A. Kamp & H. Hvid (Eds.), Elderly care in transition: Management, meaning and identity at work. A Scandinavian perspective (pp. 13–28). Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230348202_1

Knijn, T., & Kremer, M. (1997). Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states: Towards inclusive citizenship. Social Politics, Fall, 328–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.sp.a034270

Kröger, T. (2009). Care research and disability studies: Nothing in common? Critical Social Policy, 29(3), 398–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018309105177


Krøjer, J., & Dupret, K. (2015). Moral literacy in technological care work. Ethics and Social Welfare, 9(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2014.938672

Kvale, S. (2007). Interview - En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Langergaard, L. L. (2011). Innovating the publicness of the public sector. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press. http://forskning.ruc.dk/site/services/downloadRegister/35980324/xThesis_Langergaard.pdf.

Moltesen, J., & Dahlerup, S. (2007). Dekoblingspolitik: visioner og initiativer i den danske regerings innovationspolitik. København: Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet.

Morris, J. (1997). Care or empowerment? A disability rights perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 31(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00037

Morris, J. (2001). Impairment and disability: Constructing and ethics of care that promotes human rights. Hypatia, 16(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00750.x

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14

Okin, S. M. (1989). Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics, 229–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/293064

Parton, N. (2003). Rethinking professional practice: The contributions of social constructionism and the feminist 'ethics of care'. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/33.1.1

Rådet for Teknologi og Innovation. (2008). “Strategi for styrket innovation i den offentlige sektor.” ufm.dk/publikationer/2008/strategi-for-Styrket-Innovation-I- Den-Offentlige-Sektor.
http://ufm.dk/publikationer/2008/filer-2008/strategi-for-styrket-innovation-i-den-offentlige-sektor.pdf.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Fourth Edition. New York, US: The Free Press.

Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: the moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598449

Sundbo, J., & Toivonen, M. (2011). Introduction. In J. Sundbo & M. Toivonen (Eds.), User-based innovation in services (pp. 1–21). Cheltenham, UK and Northhampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

Tanggaard, L., & Wegener, C. (2015). Why novelty is overrated. Journal of Education and Work, 1–18.

Toivonen, M. (2010). Different types of innovation processes in services and their organizational implications. In F. Gallouj & F. Djellal (Eds.), The handbook of innovation and services – A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 221–48). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803304.00021

Wærness, K. (1984). The rationality of caring. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 5, 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X8452003

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072002

Young, I. M. (1989). Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, 99(2), 250–74. https://doi.org/10.1086/293065
Published
2017-07-17
How to Cite
Langergaard, L. L. (2017). Care work an diffusion of innovation in Danish elder care. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 8. https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.2213
Section
Articles