Care work an diffusion of innovation in Danish elder care
This article explores the interplay between different types of knowledge and rationality in care work through a case study of a nursing home innovation project in a Danish municipality. The aim is to understand the implications for innovation processes and dissemination within the context of elder care. Care work, in some sense, relies on relational and contextual knowledge which may lead to challenges when innovation and best practices are to be diffused across organizations. This is especially true since diffusion often relies on codification of practices and knowledge. Caring rationality is essential to how technologies and methods are practiced in the care situation, and thus also essential for best practices and how they are disseminated. However, other types of codified and explicit rationality are equally important. The article concludes that there are several types of knowledge in play in care work practices and innovation, and it indicates that communities of practice could be key to understanding how to share and learn from best practices across organizations.
Bason, C. (2007). Velfærdsinnovation: ledelse af nytænkning i den offentlige sektor. København: Børsen.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science: Special Issue: Organizational Learning: Papers in Honor of (and By) James G. March, 2(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
Dahl, H. M. (2009). New public management, care and struggles about recognition. Critical Social Policy, 29(4), 634–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018309341903
Dahl, H. M. (2012). “Omsorg, Styring og Køn Gennem Tavshed og Italesættelse.” Kvinder, Køn & Forskning no. 3, 52–59.
Dahl, H. M., & Rasmussen, B. (2012). Paradoxes in elderly care: The Nordic model. In A. Kamp & H. Hvid (Eds.), Elderly care in transition: Management, meaning and identity at work. A Scandinavian perspective (pp. 29–49). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Daly, M., & Lewis, J. (2000). The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 281–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00281.x
Davies, C. (1995). Competence versus care? Gender and caring work revisited. Acta Sociologica, 38(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939503800103
De Jong, J. P. J. & Vermeulen, P. A. M. (2003). Organizing successful new service development: A literature review. Management Decision, 41(9), 844–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310491706
Du Gay, P. (2008). 'Without affection or enthusiasm' problems of involvement and attachment in 'responsive' public management. Organization, 15(3), 335–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508408088533
Dybbroe, B. (2012). The meaning of work from subjective and intersubjective perspectives – a daily conflict of creating and losing meaning in elderly care. In A. Kamp & H. Hvid (Eds.), Elderly care in transition: Management, meaning and identity at work. A Scandinavian perspective (pp. 131–64). Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Eriksen, E. O. (1999). Kommunikativ ledelse: Om styring af offentlige organisationer. Fakbokforlaget: Bergen.
Fine, M., & Glendinning, C. (2005). Dependence, independence or inter-dependence? Revisiting the concepts of 'care' and 'dependency'. Ageing & Society, 25, 601–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X05003600
Friedman, M. (1995). Beyond caring: The de-moralization of gender. In V. Held (Ed.), Justice and care: essential readings in feminist ethics (pp. 61–77). Colorado US and Oxford UK: Westview Press.
Fuglsang, L. (2008). "Balancen mellem ledelse og bricolage: ledelsesdilemmaer i bæredygtig offentlig innovation." Paper til Det Danske ledelsesakademis 3. konference, Clarion Hotel, København, d. 8.-9. december.
Fuglsang, L., & Rønning, R. (2014). Introduction – framing innovation in public service sectors: A contextual approach. In L. Fuglsang, R. Rønning & B. Enquist (Eds.), Framing innovation in public service sectors (pp. 1–17). New York and London: Routledge.
Fuglsang, L., & Sørensen, F. (2011).The balance between bricolage and innovation: Management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 31(4), 581–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2010.504302
Gilligan, C. (2009). In a different voice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Habermas, J. (1990). "Moral, samfund og etik: Et interview ved Torben Hviid Nielsen. Politica Bind 22, Det civile samfund, 224–247.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34.
Hartley, J. (2016). Organisational and governance aspects of diffusing public innovation. In J. Torfing P. Triantafilou (Eds.) Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance (pp. 71–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hartley, J., & Benington, J. (2006). Copy and paste, or graft and transplant? Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational networks. Public Money & Management, 26(2), 101–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00508.x
Held, V. (1995). Introduction. In V. Held (Ed.), Justice and care: Essential readings in feminist ethics (pp. 61–77). Colorado US and Oxford UK: Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6386(95)90075-6
Kamp, A., & Hvid, H. (2012). Introduction: Elderly care in transition. In A. Kamp & H. Hvid (Eds.), Elderly care in transition: Management, meaning and identity at work. A Scandinavian perspective (pp. 13–28). Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230348202_1
Knijn, T., & Kremer, M. (1997). Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states: Towards inclusive citizenship. Social Politics, Fall, 328–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.sp.a034270
Kröger, T. (2009). Care research and disability studies: Nothing in common? Critical Social Policy, 29(3), 398–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018309105177
Krøjer, J., & Dupret, K. (2015). Moral literacy in technological care work. Ethics and Social Welfare, 9(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2014.938672
Kvale, S. (2007). Interview - En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Langergaard, L. L. (2011). Innovating the publicness of the public sector. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press. http://forskning.ruc.dk/site/services/downloadRegister/35980324/xThesis_Langergaard.pdf.
Moltesen, J., & Dahlerup, S. (2007). Dekoblingspolitik: visioner og initiativer i den danske regerings innovationspolitik. København: Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet.
Morris, J. (1997). Care or empowerment? A disability rights perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 31(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00037
Morris, J. (2001). Impairment and disability: Constructing and ethics of care that promotes human rights. Hypatia, 16(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00750.x
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
Okin, S. M. (1989). Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics, 229–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/293064
Parton, N. (2003). Rethinking professional practice: The contributions of social constructionism and the feminist 'ethics of care'. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/33.1.1
Rådet for Teknologi og Innovation. (2008). “Strategi for styrket innovation i den offentlige sektor.” ufm.dk/publikationer/2008/strategi-for-Styrket-Innovation-I- Den-Offentlige-Sektor.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Fourth Edition. New York, US: The Free Press.
Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: the moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598449
Sundbo, J., & Toivonen, M. (2011). Introduction. In J. Sundbo & M. Toivonen (Eds.), User-based innovation in services (pp. 1–21). Cheltenham, UK and Northhampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Tanggaard, L., & Wegener, C. (2015). Why novelty is overrated. Journal of Education and Work, 1–18.
Toivonen, M. (2010). Different types of innovation processes in services and their organizational implications. In F. Gallouj & F. Djellal (Eds.), The handbook of innovation and services – A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 221–48). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803304.00021
Wærness, K. (1984). The rationality of caring. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 5, 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X8452003
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072002
Young, I. M. (1989). Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. Ethics, 99(2), 250–74. https://doi.org/10.1086/293065
Copyright (c) 2017 Luise Li Langergaard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).