Mediation, Collaborative Learning and Trust in Norwegian School Governing: Synthesis from a Nordic Research Project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1952Abstract
This paper analyses productive patterns through which school superintendents and subordinated principals collaborate at the local levels of implementation in the Nordic countries. The underlying theoretical premise is that the school governance systems in the Nordic countries, as a function of strengthened state steering and a variety of local political conditions, entail a series of loose couplings—described by the broken chain metaphor. The analysis is based on a review of findings from a comparative Nordic research project. The review reveals that school superintendents and principals to a large extent activate professional learning forums as integration mechanism—to make collective sense of ambiguous national reforms. Important learning conditions that emerge from the country reports, on which the reviewed research is based, seem to cluster and cohere around learning climate, interpersonal trust, leadership support and a shared knowledge base between the school leaders and the municipal apparatus. Implications for research and practice are discussed.Downloads
Metrics
References
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
Bjørk, L., & Kowalski, T. J. (2005). The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Bordieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2002). Reformer og lederskap: Omstilling i den utøvende makt (Reforms and leadership: Change in the governing power). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Datnow, A. (2002). Can we transplant educational reform, and does it last? Journal of Educational Change, 3(3-4), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021221627854
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419-1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00386
Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In R. Kramer & K. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust across organizational contexts: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239-272). New York: Sage.
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
Fullan, M., & Starratt, L. (2009). Sustaining leadership in complex times: An individual and system solution. In M. Fullan (Ed.), The challenge of change. Start school improvement now! (pp. 157-178). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109-116.
Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819-832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05277975
Hjertø, K. B., & Paulsen, J. M. (2017). Learning outcomes in leadership teams: The multi-level dynamics of mastery goal orientation, team psychological safety, and team potency. Human Performance, 30(1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2016.1250765
Høyer, H. C., Paulsen, J. M., Nihlfors, E., Kofod, K., Kanervio, P., & Pulkkinen, S. (2014). Control and Trust in Local School Governance. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School Boards in the Governance Process (pp. 101-115). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05494-0_7
Høyer, H. C., & Wood, E. (2011). Trust and control: Public administration and risk society. International Journal of Learning and Change, 5(2), 178-188. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2011.044209
Johansson, O., Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., Paulsen, J. M., & Risku, M. (2011). The Nordic Superintendents’ Leadership Roles: Cross-National Comparisons. In J. Mc Beath & T. Townsend (Eds.), International Handbook on Leadership for Learning (pp. 695-725). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_30
Johansson, O., Nihlfors, E., & Steen, L. J. (2014). School Boards in Sweden. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School Boards in the Governance Process (pp. 6). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05494-0_5
Johansson, O., Nihlfors, E., Steen, L. J., & Karlsson, S. (2016). Superintendents in Sweden: Structures, cultural relations and leadership. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 207-232). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
Lee, M., Louis, K. S., & Anderson, S. (2012). Local education authorities and student learning: The effects of policies and practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2011.652125
Leithwood, K. (2000). Understanding schools as intelligent systems. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
Leithwood, K. (2008). Characteristics of high performing school districts. A review of empirical evidence. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE).
Leithwood, K., Anderson, S. E., & Louis, K. S. (2012). Principal efficacy: District-lead professional development. In K. Leithwood & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Linking leadership to student learning (pp. 119-141). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (1998). Organizational learning in schools. Contexts of learning. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers.
Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. http://www.wallacefoundation.org
Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2008). Learning about system renewal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(2), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143207087778
Louis, K. S. (2015). Linking leadership to learning: State, district and local effects. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(3), 30321. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.30321
Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. A. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning. Final report of research findings. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE).
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
Moos, L., Kofod, K., & Brinkkjær, U. (2016). Danish superintendents are players in multiple networks. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 207-232). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_2
Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Paulsen, J. M. (2016a). Directions for our investigation of the chain of governance and the agents. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 1-24). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_1
Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Paulsen, J. M. (2016b). Tendencies and trends. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 311-334). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_11
Moos, L., & Paulsen, J. M. (2014). School Boards in the Governance Process. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05494-0
Nihlfors, E., & Johansson, O. (2013). Rektor – en stark länk i styrningen av skolan (The school principal – a strong linkage in school governing). Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
Nihlfors, E., Johansson, O., Moos, L., Paulsen, J. M., & Risku, M. (2013). The Nordic superintendents´ leadership roles: Cross-national comparison. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership. Is there a Nordic model? (pp. 193-212). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6226-8_12
Paulsen, J. M. (2014a). Norwegian superintendents as mediators of change initiatives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.945654
Paulsen, J. M. (2014b). School principals’ perceptions of school ownership capacity. Paper presented at the Educational Leadership in Transition – the Global Perspectives, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
Paulsen, J. M., & Høyer, H. C. (2011). Superintendent leadership in Norwegian municipalities. Country report: Norway. Rena: Hedmark University College.
Paulsen, J. M., & Høyer, H. C. (2016a). External control and professional trust in Norwegian school governing: Synthesis from a Nordic research project. Nordic Studies in Education, 36(2), 86-102. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2016-02-02
Paulsen, J. M., & Høyer, H. C. (2016b). Norwegian superintendents are mediators in the governance Chain. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 99-138). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_4
Paulsen, J. M., Johansson, O., Nihlfors, E., Moos, L., & Risku, M. (2014). Superintendent leadership under shifting governance regimes. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 812-822. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2013-0103
Paulsen, J. M., & Moos, L. (2014). Globalisation and Europeanisation of Nordic Governance. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School Boards in the Governance Process (pp. 165-178). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05494-0_11
Paulsen, J. M., Nihlfors, E., Brinkkjær, U., & Risku, M. (2016). Superintendent leadership in hierarchy and network. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 207-232). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_7
Paulsen, J. M., & Skedsmo, G. (2014). Mediating tensions between state control, local autonomy and professional trust. Norwegian school district leadership in practice. In A. Nir (Ed.), The educational superintendent: Between trust and regulation: An international perspective (pp. 39-54). New York: Lambert Academic Publishing.
Paulsen, J. M., & Strand, M. (2014). School Boards in Norway. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School Boards in the Governance Process (pp. 49-65). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05494-0_4
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Milton Keynes: Open Univesity Press.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. Review of Research in Education, 16, 353-389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167356
Røvik, K. A. (1996). Deinstitutionalization and the logic of fashion. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 139-172). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Sarason, S. (1996). Revisiting “The culture of the school and the problem of change”. New York: Teachers College Press.
Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344-354. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24348410
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. ideas, interests, and identities. Los Angeles: Sage.
Skedsmo, G. (2009). School governing in transition? Perspectives, purposes and perceptions of evaluation policy. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Oslo, Oslo.
Stoll, L., & Temperley, J. (2009). Creative leadership teams: Capacity building and succession planning. Management in Education, 23(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020608099077
Sutton, R. I. (2010). Good boss, bad boss. How to be the best and learn from the worst. London: Piatkus.
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 308-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005493
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547-593. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070004547
Wahlstrom, K., Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning. Executive Summary of Research Findings. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). A social cognitive theory of organization management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Jan Merok Paulsen, Øyvind Henriksen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
