Characterization of Urinary Tract Stones  with Dual Energy Computed Tomography

Baidyanath Yadav; Surendra Maharjan

doi:10.7577/radopen.2001

Authors

Baidyanath Yadav
Surendra Maharjan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.2001

Keywords:

Attenuation, Dual Energy Computed Tomography, DE ratio, Hounsfield Unit, Urinary calculi.

Abstract

Introduction. Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) scan can provides simple and reliable differentiation between uric acid and non-uric acid stones. The characterization of various stones was based on the dual energy ratio and x-ray attenuation or HU.

Methodology. A prospective study was conducted among 101 adult patients in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH), Nepal. Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants. The standard low doses CT KUB were performed in multi-slice CT scanner (Siemens Somatom Definition AS+ 128 slice) at 120 kVp and 250 mAs. When stones were detected, second dual energy scans using 80 kVp and 140 kVp were obtained focusing only on the region of stones for their characterization. After post processing and graphical analysis at Syngo Via work station, the components of the stones were identified. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS v21.0 software.

Results. Out of 101 patients, 49 (48.5%) had calcium oxalate stones, 17 (16.87%) had uric acid stones, 16 (15.8%) had hydroxyapatite, 15 (14.9%) had cystine and 4 (4%) had mixed type of stones. Dual energy ratios were ranged from 0.55-1.11 for uric acid stone, 1.12-1.24 for cystine and more than 1.24 for calcium oxalate and hydroxyapatite stones. The mean HU noted in our study were; for uric acid stones (461.12 ± 119 HU at 80 kV, 449 ± 98.5 HU at 140 kV), for cystine (870.79 ± 386 at 80 kV, 743 ± 341 at 140 kV), for calcium oxalate (1246 ± 448 at 80 kV, 915 ± 316 at 140 kV) for hydroxyapatite (1301 ± 387 at 80 kV, 896 ± 315 at 140 kV) and mixed stone had (779.25 ± 269 HU at 80 kV, 665.5 ± 252 HU at 140 kV).

References

Stoker J, van Randen A, Laméris W, Boermeester MA. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology. 2009; 253 (1):31-46.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2531090302

Hustey FM, Meldon SW, Banet GA, Gerson LW, Blanda M, Lewis LM. The use of abdominal computed tomography in older ED patients with acute abdominal pain.
American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2005;23(3):259. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/2005.02.021

Evan AP, Coe FL, Lingeman JE, Worcester E. Insights on the pathology of kidney stone formation. Urological Research. 2005; 33(5):383-9.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-005-0488-0

Eliahou R, Hidas G, Duvdevani M, Sosna J. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tomography: an emerging application. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI . 2010; 31(4):315-20.https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2010.05.002

Gupta AK, Chowdhury V, Khandelwal N. Diagnostic Radiology. Reccent Advances and Applied Physics in Imaging, 2nd edn. New Delhi, Japee brothers.2013.

Kambadakone AR, Eisner BH, Catalano OA, Sahani DV. New and evolving concepts in the imaging and management of urolithiasis:urologists' perspective. Radiographics. 2010; 30(3):603-23.https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.303095146

Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Chaussy C, Thuroff S. Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an update. European Urology. 2001; 39:187–199. https://doi.org/10.1159/000052435

Trinchieri A. Epidemiological trends in urolithiasis: impact on our health care systems. Urological Research. 2006; 34(2):151-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-005-0029-x

Dretler SP, Spencer BA. CT and stone fragility. Journal of Endourology. 2004; 15(1): 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1089/08927790150500926

Zhong P, Preminger GM. Mechanisms of differing stone fragility in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Journal of Endourology. 2009; 8(4): 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1994.8.263

Qu M, Jaramillo-Alvarez G, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Liu Y, Duan X, Wang J et al. Urinary stone differentiation in patients with large body size using dual-energy dual-source computed tomography. European Radiology. 2013 May 1;23(5):1408-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2727-4

Qu M, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Leng S, Williams JC, Vrtiska TJ, Lieske JC et al. Dual-energy dual-source CT with additional spectral filtration can improve the differentiation of non–uric acid renal stones: an ex vivo phantom study. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011 Jun;196(6):1279-87.https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5041

Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK, Merkle EM, Simmons WN, Pierre SA et al. Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition—pilot study. Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):813-20.https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2503080545

Nykamp S. Dual energy imaging for determining urinary calculi composition: a theoretical and experimental study with computed tomography. 2014. Master, Dissertation. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. Paper 2224. London: The University of Western Ontario.

Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M, Coulon P, Lemaitre L, Gofrit ON et al. Determination of Renal Stone Composition with Dual-Energy CT: In Vivo Analysis and Comparison with X-ray Diffraction. Radiology. 2010 Nov;257(2):394-401. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100249

Thomas C, Heuschmid M, Schilling D, Ketelsen D, Tsiflikas I, Stenzl A et al. Urinary calculi composed of uric acid, cystine, and mineral salts: differentiation with dual-energy CT at a radiation dose comparable to that of intravenous pyelography. Radiology. 2010 Nov;257(2):402-9.https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100526

American College of Radiology. ACR–AAPM practice parameter for diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses in medical x-ray imaging. Reston, VA: ACR. 2014.